Launch offer — up to 85% off across all services | Free Educational Brief with every drafting order | Claim it →

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Chapter VII · Of Offences Against the State
← Previous Section 150 of 358 Next →
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — Section 150

Concealing With Intent to Facilitate Design to Wage War

Section 150 punishes concealing, by act or illegal omission, the existence of a design to wage war against the Government of India, intending or knowing it likely that the concealment will facilitate the waging of such war, with imprisonment up to ten years and fine.

Please note: This page reflects our understanding of the law as of the date it was last reviewed. Parliament, the State Legislatures, and the courts continue to amend and interpret this law, and this page may not yet reflect the most recent change. Please verify the current text of the law independently, and consult a licensed advocate for advice on your own matter, before relying on this page.

Corresponding Provision Under Prior Law

Verified against the National Crime Records Bureau's official BNS–IPC concordance (Sankalan Portal), which maps Section 150 to old IPC Section 123, and cross-checked directly against the bare text of both Acts.

BNS sectionIPC, 1860 equivalentCategory
150123Exact

Comparing the two texts word for word, Section 150 is reproduced without any change from old IPC Section 123.

Quick Reference

Per the First Schedule to the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: punishable with imprisonment for 10 years and fine (the statute itself: imprisonment of either description up to ten years, and fine) — cognizable, non-bailable, and triable by the Court of Session.

Statutory Text (Verbatim)

Whoever by any act, or by any illegal omission, conceals the existence of a design to wage war against the Government of India, intending by such concealment to facilitate, or knowing it to be likely that such concealment will facilitate, the waging of such war, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.

Source: Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (Act No. 45 of 2023), as published in the Gazette of India Extraordinary.

Explanation & Illustration (Lexovia's Commentary — Not Statutory Text)

Concealing a design to wage war

Explanation (Lexovia's Commentary)

This section punishes a person who, by some act or by an illegal omission (an omission that is “illegal” within Section 2(15) — that is, an omission which is an offence, is prohibited by law, or furnishes ground for a civil action), conceals the existence of a design by others to wage war against the Government of India, where the concealment is intended to facilitate that war, or where the concealer knows it is likely to have that facilitating effect. This is distinct from actually waging or preparing to wage war — it targets those who help such a design succeed through concealment, such as by staying silent when under a legal duty to disclose.

Illustration (Lexovia's Own Example)
A learns of a plan by others to wage war against the Government of India and, despite being under a legal duty to report such information, deliberately says nothing, knowing that his silence is likely to help the plan succeed. A is liable under Section 150 for this concealment by illegal omission.
Want legal research on any topic or drafting? Order Now →

Judgment(s) Applicable to This Section (Lexovia's Commentary — Quoted Paragraphs Verbatim)

These judgment(s) relate to Section 150 as a whole rather than to one specific sub-section, and so are presented together here rather than alongside a particular clause above.

State (N.C.T. of Delhi) v. Navjot Sandhu @ Afsan Guru (Parliament attack case), [2005] Supp. 2 SCR 79; (2005) 11 SCC 600 (Supreme Court of India, decided 04-08-2005; SCR p.295)

Quoted Paragraph (Verbatim)
“design of Afzal and other conspirators to attack the Parliament which is an act of waging war, the appellant Shaukat has made himself liable for punishment for the lesser offence under Section 123 IPC.”
What This Judgment Means (Lexovia's Commentary)

Court convicts Shaukat under s.123 IPC (concealing design to wage war by illegal omission to inform police), the direct predecessor of BNS 150.

Source: copy of the judgment obtained from the Supreme Court of India's official website.

Related / Cross-Referenced Sections

FAQs

Does simply knowing about a plan to wage war, without acting, make a person liable?

Only where the person actually conceals the existence of the design by an act or an illegal omission (an omission that is illegal within Section 2(15)), and does so intending or knowing it likely to facilitate the waging of war — mere passive knowledge without concealment as defined here would not, by itself, satisfy this section.

What is an "illegal omission" in this context?

Section 2(15) provides that the word “illegal” applies to everything which is an offence or which is prohibited by law, or which furnishes ground for a civil action, and that a person is “legally bound to do” whatever it is illegal in him to omit. An illegal omission here is therefore an omission of that kind — for example, failing to report information despite a legal obligation to disclose it, where that failure conceals the existence of the design to wage war.

Does the war actually have to occur for this section to apply?

The section requires only that the design to wage war exist and be concealed with the requisite intent or knowledge — it does not require that the war ultimately be waged.

← Previous Section 150 of 358 Next →
Spotted something that looks outdated because of a recent amendment, mismatched, or just a typographical error? Email us or message us on Instagram — it helps us keep this page accurate for everyone who reads it after you.