Launch offer — up to 85% off across all services | Free Educational Brief with every drafting order | Claim it →

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Chapter IX · Of Offences Relating to Elections
← Previous Section 170 of 358 Next →
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — Section 170

Bribery

Section 170 defines the offence of bribery in connection with an election as either giving a gratification to induce or reward the exercise of an electoral right, or accepting a gratification as a reward or inducement for the exercise of such a right, subject to a proviso for genuine declarations of public policy or promises of public action. This section defines the offence only; its punishment is separately set out in Section 173.

Please note: This page reflects our understanding of the law as of the date it was last reviewed. Parliament, the State Legislatures, and the courts continue to amend and interpret this law, and this page may not yet reflect the most recent change. Please verify the current text of the law independently, and consult a licensed advocate for advice on your own matter, before relying on this page.

Corresponding Provision Under Prior Law

Verified against the National Crime Records Bureau's official BNS–IPC concordance (Sankalan Portal), which maps Section 170 to old IPC Section 171B, and cross-checked directly against the bare text of both Acts.

BNS sectionIPC, 1860 equivalentCategory
170171BExact

Comparing the two texts word for word, Section 170 is reproduced without any change from old IPC Section 171B.

Quick Reference

This section defines the offence of bribery but does not itself prescribe a punishment. It does not appear as its own row in the First Schedule to the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — the First Schedule carries no separate entry for Section 170. The punishment for this offence is instead set out in Section 173 (Punishment for bribery).

Statutory Text (Verbatim)

(1) Whoever—

(i) gives a gratification to any person with the object of inducing him or any other person to exercise any electoral right or of rewarding any person for having exercised any such right; or

(ii) accepts either for himself or for any other person any gratification as a reward for exercising any such right or for inducing or attempting to induce any other person to exercise any such right,

commits the offence of bribery:

Provided that a declaration of public policy or a promise of public action shall not be an offence under this section.

(2) A person who offers, or agrees to give, or offers or attempts to procure, a gratification shall be deemed to give a gratification.

(3) A person who obtains or agrees to accept or attempts to obtain a gratification shall be deemed to accept a gratification, and a person who accepts a gratification as a motive for doing what he does not intend to do, or as a reward for doing what he has not done, shall be deemed to have accepted the gratification as a reward.

Source: Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (Act No. 45 of 2023), as published in the Gazette of India Extraordinary.

Explanation & Illustration (Lexovia's Commentary — Not Statutory Text)

Item (1): The offence of bribery (giving or accepting a gratification, subject to the public-policy proviso)

Explanation (Lexovia's Commentary)

Bribery under this section covers both sides of the transaction: giving a gratification to induce or reward the exercise of an electoral right, and accepting a gratification as such a reward or inducement. The statute's own proviso protects a genuine declaration of public policy or a promise of public action — for instance, a candidate's manifesto promise — from being swept into the offence merely because it might influence how people vote.

Illustration (Lexovia's Own Example)
A candidate's agent hands out cash to voters in exchange for a promise to vote for the candidate. This falls within item (1). By contrast, the same candidate publicly promising to build a new road if elected, addressed to the electorate generally, falls within the statute's own proviso and is not bribery.

Item (2): Deemed giving of a gratification (offering, agreeing, or attempting to procure)

Explanation (Lexovia's Commentary)

This item extends "giving" a gratification to also cover merely offering it, agreeing to give it, or attempting to procure it for someone else — so the offence is not defeated simply because the gratification was never actually handed over.

Illustration (Lexovia's Own Example)
A person offers a voter a sum of money to vote a particular way, but the voter refuses the offer. The mere offer is deemed to be giving a gratification under item (2).

Item (3): Deemed acceptance of a gratification (obtaining, agreeing, or attempting to obtain)

Explanation (Lexovia's Commentary)

This item mirrors item (2) from the recipient's side: obtaining, agreeing to accept, or attempting to obtain a gratification is deemed to be accepting it. It also clarifies that accepting a gratification as a motive for something the recipient never actually intends to do, or as a reward for something the recipient has not actually done, is still deemed acceptance as a reward — closing off the argument that no real exchange took place.

Illustration (Lexovia's Own Example)
A voter accepts payment as a reward for having voted a certain way, even though the voter secretly had no intention of actually voting that way and did not do so. This is still deemed acceptance of the gratification as a reward under item (3).
Want legal research on any topic or drafting? Order Now →

Related / Cross-Referenced Sections

FAQs

Where is the punishment for bribery under this section?

This section only defines the offence of bribery. Its punishment is separately set out in Section 173.

Does the gratification actually have to change hands for the offence to be committed?

No. Merely offering, agreeing to give, or attempting to procure a gratification is deemed to be giving one; similarly, obtaining, agreeing to accept, or attempting to obtain a gratification is deemed to be accepting one.

Can a candidate's election promises be treated as bribery?

The statute's own proviso excludes a declaration of public policy or a promise of public action from being an offence under this section.

← Previous Section 170 of 358 Next →
Spotted something that looks outdated because of a recent amendment, mismatched, or just a typographical error? Email us or message us on Instagram — it helps us keep this page accurate for everyone who reads it after you.