Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — Section 220
Illegal Purchase or Bid for Property Offered for Sale by Authority of Public Servant
Section 220 punishes whoever, at a sale of property held by the lawful authority of a public servant,
purchases or bids for property on account of any person — themselves or another — whom
they know to be under a legal incapacity to purchase that property at that sale, or bids without
intending to perform the obligations they thereby undertake, with imprisonment of either description
for up to one month, or fine of up to two hundred rupees, or both.
Please note: This page reflects our understanding of the law as of the date it was
last reviewed. Parliament, the State Legislatures, and the courts continue to amend and interpret
this law, and this page may not yet reflect the most recent change. Please verify the current text
of the law independently, and consult a licensed advocate for advice on your own matter, before
relying on this page.
Corresponding Provision Under Prior Law
Verified against the National Crime Records Bureau's official BNS–IPC concordance (Sankalan
Portal), which maps Section 220 to old IPC Section 185, and independently against the text of
Section 185 itself in the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
| BNS section | IPC, 1860 equivalent | Category |
| 220 | 185 | Exact |
Exact: the conduct and punishment, including the fine cap of two hundred rupees,
are word-for-word identical to old IPC Section 185.
Quick Reference
Per the First Schedule to the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: punishable with imprisonment for 1 month, or fine of 200 rupees, or both — non-cognizable, bailable, and triable by any Magistrate. Not compoundable: Section 220 appears in neither compounding table of Section 359 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. In the First Schedule, “any Magistrate” does not include Executive Magistrates (Explanatory Note (2)).
Statutory Text (Verbatim)
Whoever, at any sale of property held by the lawful authority of a public servant, as such, purchases or bids for any property on account of any person, whether himself or any other, whom he knows to be under a legal incapacity to purchase that property at that sale, or bids for such property not intending to perform the obligations under which he lays himself by such bidding, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to one month, or with fine which may extend to two hundred rupees, or with both.
Source: Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (Act No. 45 of 2023), as published in the Gazette of India Extraordinary.
Purchasing or bidding at a public servant's sale on behalf of a legally incapacitated person, or bidding without intending to perform the resulting obligations
Explanation (Lexovia's Commentary)
At a sale held by the lawful authority of a public servant, a person who purchases or bids for
property on account of anyone (including themselves) known to be under a legal incapacity to
purchase it at that sale, or who bids without intending to fulfil the obligations that bidding
creates, commits this offence.
Illustration (Lexovia's Own Example)
A person, knowing a family member is legally barred from purchasing land at a revenue-authority
auction, bids on that member's behalf anyway. This falls within Section 220.
Want legal research on any topic or drafting? Order Now →
Related / Cross-Referenced Sections
Section 219 (Obstructing sale of property offered for sale by authority of public servant); Section
221 (Obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions, the next section of Chapter
XIII). (Shown as plain references for now; once the site exists these become direct links.)
FAQs
Does this section apply only when someone bids for themselves?
No. It covers bidding or purchasing on account of any person, whether the bidder themselves or
someone else, known to be under a legal incapacity to purchase at that sale.
What is the punishment under this section?
Imprisonment of either description up to one month, or fine up to two hundred rupees, or both.
How does this section differ from the old law?
It does not. Section 220 is word-for-word identical to old IPC Section 185.
Spotted something that looks outdated because of a recent amendment, mismatched, or just a
typographical error?
Email us or
message us on Instagram
— it helps us keep this page accurate for everyone who reads it after you.