Not sure where you stand? Find out what the law and the courts actually say about your situation.
"Lexovia's legal research goes beyond a summary of the law. Every report covers what the statute says, what judgments exist on the question, and the counter-arguments the other side could raise — explained in plain language and applied to your specific facts, with illustrations where they help. Copies of the relevant judgments are delivered along with the report itself, so you can see exactly what the research is based on. Your details stay strictly confidential — and if you'd rather not share anything identifying, describe your situation with names and specifics changed; the legal question and the research stay exactly the same. Written at a fixed price, delivered as a PDF. If a document needs to be drafted after, Lexovia's own team can draft that too."
Which report do you need?
Five reports, each answering a different kind of question. Find yours below.
Five research reports, each priced and ordered on its own.
Premium Research Report (15–20 Judgments)
The deepest of the five, and the one to choose if you only order one. Analyses fifteen to twenty relevant judgments on your question, grouped by the principle each one establishes rather than listed chronologically, so you can see the shape of the judicial landscape rather than a pile of citations. Where courts differ, that's set out too, and where the law is unsettled, it says so.
Covers — A wide, thorough survey of one subject built from 15–20 relevant judgments — enough depth and breadth to support a decision you can't afford to get wrong.
Does not cover — Not a single question — this is depth and volume on one subject as a whole.
Scope: 15–20 judgments, one subject, comprehensive.
Example: You're deciding whether to litigate a dispute worth years of cost and effort, and need to see the entire judicial landscape on the underlying question — not one ruling, but the full pattern of how courts have approached it — before committing.
Latest SC/HC Position Report
Answers one question: what is the law on this, today. Identifies the most recent Supreme Court or High Court ruling that governs your question, states the position those courts currently take, and cites the judgments it rests on. It doesn't trace history or weigh competing views — it gives you the current answer and the authority behind it.
Covers — Identifies the current, settled position of the Supreme Court or High Courts on one specific legal question you name, stated in plain terms and backed by the exact judgment(s) that establish it.
Does not cover — A question where the law itself is still unsettled or contested between different courts, and does not trace how the law reached this point historically — it gives you where the law stands today, on one question, nothing more and nothing less.
Scope: One question, one settled answer, directly citable.
Example: You've been told a notice you received relies on a limitation period that may have already lapsed — this report gives you the current Supreme Court/High Court position on that limitation question, with the judgment that settles it.
Conflicting Views Analysis Report
For questions where the courts have not spoken with one voice. Sets out each competing position, identifies which court took it and on what reasoning, and shows where the weight of authority currently sits. If different benches have gone different ways, you'll see exactly how and why.
Covers — Examines one legal question where courts have genuinely taken different positions — laying out the judgments that support your intended position, together with the judgments an opposing party would rely on against you. Built for situations where you need to take a position and also know exactly what the other side can argue against it, before a negotiation, a filing, or a decision you can't easily reverse.
Does not cover — A question that already has one single settled answer with no real disagreement between courts, and does not survey an entire subject end to end — it stays focused on one specific point of genuine disagreement.
Scope: One contested question, both sides of the argument mapped.
Example: You've received conflicting opinions on whether a security deposit is legally recoverable after a certain event — this report lays out the judgments each side would rely on, so you know exactly what you're up against before you act.
Evolution of Law Report
Traces how the law on a subject arrived where it is — the judgments that shifted it, the amendments that changed it, and the reasoning at each turn, in order. Tells you whether an older authority still holds or has been overtaken, which is often the question that actually matters.
Covers — Traces how the law on one subject has changed over time — the key judgments and legislative amendments that shaped it, in order, from where it began to where it stands now.
Does not cover — A single present-day answer with no historical background, and does not weigh two competing current positions against each other — this is about the timeline, not a single point-in-time answer.
Scope: One subject, full historical development, current position included.
Example: You're relying on a ruling from several years ago and need to know whether it still holds, or whether later judgments and amendments have moved the law past it — this report lays out that full progression.
New Law Bundle (BNSS + BNS + BSA Comparison)
Compares the three new criminal codes against the laws they replaced — BNSS against the CrPC, BNS against the IPC, and BSA against the Evidence Act — on the provisions that actually changed. Shows what moved, what was renumbered, what is genuinely new, and what carried over untouched.
Covers — A direct, provision-by-provision comparison between the new criminal law codes and the older laws they replaced — what changed, what was retained, and why the change matters in practice.
Does not cover — General commentary on the new codes without reference to what came before them — this report is specifically about the comparison, not a standalone explainer of the new law alone.
Scope: Old law vs. new law, side by side, criminal law only.
Example: You're dealing with a matter that started under the old criminal procedure code but is now proceeding under BNSS, and need to know exactly what changed in the applicable procedure — this report lays the two versions side by side so the change is immediately clear.
What you receive
A single PDF, written for someone who isn't a lawyer.
- Delivered in 24 to 48 hours from confirmation of your order.
- Length varies with the question. A narrow question produces a short report; a contested one produces a longer one. Depth is set by the issue, not by a page count.
- Judgments cited by name and citation, with the relevant holding explained — not paraphrased away.
- The statute set out as it currently stands, with the sections that govern your question.
- Plain language throughout. Where a legal term is unavoidable, it's explained.
What we need from you
The quality of the research depends almost entirely on this. The more complete and orderly your information, the more accurate the answer.
- The facts in chronological order. What happened, and when, from the beginning. Dates matter more than you'd expect — limitation, sequence and timing often decide the answer.
- Supporting documents. Agreements, notices, orders, receipts, correspondence — anything already in your possession that touches the matter. Send what you have rather than deciding in advance what's relevant.
- The specific question you want answered. "Can I still file?" produces a better report than "tell me about my case".
- The state, court or forum, if your matter is already before one, or if local law may apply.
When the law isn't settled, the report says so
Research sometimes finds that courts genuinely disagree, or that no authority squarely covers your question. When that happens the report tells you plainly, sets out the competing positions, and explains which way the weight of authority leans. It will not manufacture a clean answer that the case law doesn't support — a false certainty is worth less than an honest uncertainty.
What a research report is not
It is statutory and judicial information — what the law says and what courts have held. It is not legal advice on your specific matter, not an opinion on whether you will succeed, and not a prediction of any outcome. Lexovia is not a law firm. For advice on your own case, consult a licensed advocate.
Three kinds of people, usually.
- Someone deciding whether to litigate. Knowing what courts have actually awarded, or how they've read a provision, before spending years finding out.
- A business assessing risk before acting. Termination, a disputed clause, a compliance question — where the cost of being wrong is larger than the cost of checking.
- A person who simply wants to understand their own matter before they instruct anyone, so they can ask better questions and recognise a poor answer.
See a complete research report before you pay for one.
A worked report, built on a fictional fact pattern using exactly the process a real order goes through — the statute, the judgments, the reasoning and the conclusion. Judge the work, not the description of it.
Tell us the question. You'll get the law behind it.
Send your facts in order, with whatever documents you have. The exact fee is confirmed before you pay anything.