Find out what the courts have actually held on your question.
Most legal services stop at drafting a document. Lexovia also researches the question behind it — what the statute says, what judgments exist, and where the courts currently stand. Written in plain language, at a fixed price, delivered as a PDF.
Drafted by Lexovia's own legal drafting team.
Which report do you need?
Five reports, each answering a different kind of question. Find yours below.
Five research reports, each priced and ordered on its own.
Premium Research Report (15–20 Judgments)
The deepest of the five, and the one to choose if you only order one. Analyses fifteen to twenty relevant judgments on your question, grouped by the principle each one establishes rather than listed chronologically, so you can see the shape of the judicial landscape rather than a pile of citations. Where courts differ, that's set out too, and where the law is unsettled, it says so.
Latest SC/HC Position Report
Answers one question: what is the law on this, today. Identifies the most recent Supreme Court or High Court ruling that governs your question, states the position those courts currently take, and cites the judgments it rests on. It doesn't trace history or weigh competing views — it gives you the current answer and the authority behind it.
Conflicting Views Analysis Report
For questions where the courts have not spoken with one voice. Sets out each competing position, identifies which court took it and on what reasoning, and shows where the weight of authority currently sits. If different benches have gone different ways, you'll see exactly how and why.
Evolution of Law Report
Traces how the law on a subject arrived where it is — the judgments that shifted it, the amendments that changed it, and the reasoning at each turn, in order. Tells you whether an older authority still holds or has been overtaken, which is often the question that actually matters.
New Law Bundle (BNSS + BNS + BSA Comparison)
Compares the three new criminal codes against the laws they replaced — BNSS against the CrPC, BNS against the IPC, and BSA against the Evidence Act — on the provisions that actually changed. Shows what moved, what was renumbered, what is genuinely new, and what carried over untouched.
What you receive
A single PDF, written for someone who isn't a lawyer.
- Delivered in 24 to 48 hours from confirmation of your order.
- Length varies with the question. A narrow question produces a short report; a contested one produces a longer one. Depth is set by the issue, not by a page count.
- Judgments cited by name and citation, with the relevant holding explained — not paraphrased away.
- The statute set out as it currently stands, with the sections that govern your question.
- Plain language throughout. Where a legal term is unavoidable, it's explained.
What we need from you
The quality of the research depends almost entirely on this. The more complete and orderly your information, the more accurate the answer.
- The facts in chronological order. What happened, and when, from the beginning. Dates matter more than you'd expect — limitation, sequence and timing often decide the answer.
- Supporting documents. Agreements, notices, orders, receipts, correspondence — anything already in your possession that touches the matter. Send what you have rather than deciding in advance what's relevant.
- The specific question you want answered. "Can I still file?" produces a better report than "tell me about my case".
- The state, court or forum, if your matter is already before one, or if local law may apply.
When the law isn't settled, the report says so
Research sometimes finds that courts genuinely disagree, or that no authority squarely covers your question. When that happens the report tells you plainly, sets out the competing positions, and explains which way the weight of authority leans. It will not manufacture a clean answer that the case law doesn't support — a false certainty is worth less than an honest uncertainty.
What a research report is not
It is statutory and judicial information — what the law says and what courts have held. It is not legal advice on your specific matter, not an opinion on whether you will succeed, and not a prediction of any outcome. Lexovia is not a law firm. For advice on your own case, consult a licensed advocate.
Three kinds of people, usually.
- Someone deciding whether to litigate. Knowing what courts have actually awarded, or how they've read a provision, before spending years finding out.
- A business assessing risk before acting. Termination, a disputed clause, a compliance question — where the cost of being wrong is larger than the cost of checking.
- A person who simply wants to understand their own matter before they instruct anyone, so they can ask better questions and recognise a poor answer.
See a complete research report before you pay for one.
A worked report, built on a fictional fact pattern using exactly the process a real order goes through — the statute, the judgments, the reasoning and the conclusion. Judge the work, not the description of it.
Tell us the question. You'll get the law behind it.
Send your facts in order, with whatever documents you have. The exact fee is confirmed before you pay anything.