Launch offer — up to 85% off across all services | Free Educational Brief with every drafting order | Claim it →

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Chapter V · Of Offences Against Woman and Child — Of Criminal Force and Assault Against Woman
← Previous Section 79 of 358 Next →
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — Section 79

Word, Gesture or Act Intended to Insult Modesty of a Woman

Section 79 closes this sub-topic of Chapter V and punishes whoever, intending to insult a woman's modesty, utters any word, makes any sound or gesture, or exhibits any object in any form, intending that it be heard or seen by her, or intrudes upon her privacy. The punishment is simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years, and fine.

Please note: This page reflects our understanding of the law as of the date it was last reviewed. Parliament, the State Legislatures, and the courts continue to amend and interpret this law, and this page may not yet reflect the most recent change. Please verify the current text of the law independently, and consult a licensed advocate for advice on your own matter, before relying on this page.

Corresponding Provision Under Prior Law

Verified against the National Crime Records Bureau's official BNS–IPC concordance (Sankalan Portal), which maps Section 79 to old IPC Section 509, and cross-checked directly against the bare text of both Acts. Unlike the several immediately preceding sections in this Chapter, old IPC Section 509 predates the later amendment package and is present in this project's local IPC source text intact, under its own number, allowing a full direct comparison.

BNS 79IPC, 1860 equivalentCategory
79509 (Word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman)Substantively changed

Comparing the two texts directly: the operative conduct described is essentially identical, with one small textual addition — BNS 79 adds the words "in any form" after "exhibits any object," making explicit that the object exhibited may take any form, a clarification not present in the old wording. The punishment, however, differs substantially: old IPC Section 509 provided simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year, or fine, or both — an entirely optional structure with a one-year maximum. BNS Section 79 instead provides simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years, and fine — tripling the maximum custodial term and making fine mandatory in addition to imprisonment, rather than an alternative to it.

Quick Reference

Classified as follows in the First Schedule to the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), quoted as that Schedule words the entry:

Section 79: punishment — “Simple imprisonment for 3 years and fine.” · cognizable or non-cognizable — “Cognizable.” · bailable or non-bailable — “Bailable.” · triable by — “Any Magistrate.”
Compoundable: Compoundable, but only with the permission of the court, by the woman whom it was intended to insult or whose privacy was intruded upon (BNSS S.359(2)).

Statutory Text (Verbatim)

Whoever, intending to insult the modesty of any woman, utters any words, makes any sound or gesture, or exhibits any object in any form, intending that such word or sound shall be heard, or that such gesture or object shall be seen, by such woman, or intrudes upon the privacy of such woman, shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years, and also with fine.

Source: Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (Act No. 45 of 2023), as published in the Gazette of India Extraordinary.

Explanation & Illustration (Lexovia's Commentary — Not Statutory Text)

Word, sound, gesture, object, or intrusion intended to insult a woman's modesty

Explanation (Lexovia's Commentary)

Section 79 is a broad, catch-all provision covering several distinct means by which a woman's modesty may be insulted: uttering words, making a sound or gesture, exhibiting an object in any form, or intruding upon her privacy. Unlike Section 74, which requires an assault or use of criminal force, none of the acts covered by Section 79 need involve any physical contact at all — the offence can be committed entirely through words, sounds, gestures, or the mere act of intruding upon privacy. The section requires a specific intention throughout: the accused must intend to insult the woman's modesty, and, for the word, sound, gesture, or object limb, must intend that it be heard or seen by her specifically. This is the least physically intrusive, but still criminalised, end of the spectrum of offences in this sub-topic of Chapter V, which runs from Section 74's assault-based offences through to this section's purely verbal, gestural, or privacy-intruding conduct.

Illustration (Lexovia's Own Example)
A, intending to insult Z's modesty, makes a lewd gesture toward Z, intending that Z see it. Z does in fact see the gesture. A is liable under Section 79 to simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years, and fine.
Want legal research on any topic or drafting? Order Now →

Judgment(s) Applicable to This Section (Lexovia's Commentary — Quoted Paragraphs Verbatim)

These judgment(s) relate to Section 79 as a whole rather than to one specific sub-section, and so are presented together here rather than alongside a particular clause above.

Mrs. Rupan Deol Bajaj & Anr. v. Kanwar Pal Singh Gill & Anr., 1995 SCC (6) 194; 1996 AIR 309 (Supreme Court of India, decided 12 October 1995; (unnumbered; JUDIS pdf p. 9 of 14))

Quoted Paragraph (Verbatim)
Unnumbered in source (JUDIS pdf p. 9 of 14)
“an offence under Section 509 IPC has been made out on the allegations contained in the FIR as the words used and gestures made by Mr. Gill were intended to insult the modesty of Mrs. Bajaj”
What This Judgment Means (Lexovia's Commentary)

Court holds that words and gestures intended to insult the modesty of a woman attract IPC s.509 (BNS 79) alongside s.354; also discusses 'modesty' test at p. 8.

Source: copy of the judgment obtained from the Supreme Court of India's official website.

Related / Cross-Referenced Sections

FAQs

Does Section 79 require any physical contact with the victim?

No. The offence can be committed entirely through words, sounds, gestures, exhibiting an object, or intruding upon the woman's privacy, without any physical contact at all.

What intention must be proved for a conviction under Section 79?

An intention to insult the woman's modesty, and, for the word, sound, gesture, or object limb, an intention that it be heard or seen by her specifically.

Is fine mandatory in addition to imprisonment under this section?

Yes. The bare text requires both simple imprisonment, for a term which may extend to three years, and fine — unlike the old IPC provision, which allowed a court to impose only a fine with no imprisonment at all.

← Previous Section 79 of 358 Next →
Spotted something that looks outdated because of a recent amendment, mismatched, or just a typographical error? Email us or message us on Instagram — it helps us keep this page accurate for everyone who reads it after you.